Hokie offense was almost totally stifled, giving up 10 sacks, 16 total
lost-yardage plays, and gaining only 192 yards. It was their worst offensive
output since they absorbed a 42-3 drubbing in the 1997 Gator Bowl. Therefore,
the focus of a game analysis is clear. The questions of what NC State did to
cause that, and what the Hokies did to combat it (hint: the answer is "not
much") will be answered here.
Sunday's Roanoke Times carried a column by Aaron
McFarling titled "O-line must shoulder this loss." That's obviously an
oversimplification. To be fair, columnists don't write the headlines, and the
second headline on the article continuation added "Play-calling hampers
effort against blitzes." And McFarling asked the questions "Where were
the screens? The quick slants? The misdirections? There's got to be something in
that playbook designed to burn blitzes."
VT offensive coordinator Bryan Stinespring has
spent a lot of time on the hot seat since taking over Tech's OC duties in 2002.
Last season, he slid off that hot seat, as his play-calling and game management
improved and Bud Foster's defense sagged, drawing the ire of Hokie fans. But now
Stiney is right back under the microscope.
With less than three minutes to go in the third
quarter, after two straight sacks of Bryan Randall, the Hokies had a miserable 7
yards total offense. They hit Jeff King with a 24-yard pass (on 3rd and 33,
unfortunately) and gained another 160 yards in the remainder of the game, but
that 7 yards – 2 rushing yards and 5 passing yards – is ingrained in my mind
as the epitome of Tech's offensive futility in the game.
Courtesy of the Roanoke Times, here are the ugly
- As mentioned above, the 192 yards were the
fewest since UNC destroyed Tech 42-3 in the Gator Bowl, and the Tarheels
held VT to 185 yards.
- The 10 sacks were the most recorded by a VT
opponent since the NCAA started keeping the stat in 1989.
- Tech's 36 rushing yards -- which includes the
78 yards lost in sack yardage -- was the Hokies' lowest total since the 38-7
blowout at the hands of Pittsburgh in 2001 (15 yards).
- The Hokies had (-14) yards on 17 plays in the
As good as NC State's defense is, and it is good,
those numbers are hard to stomach. It's not so much that they happened, it's the
way they happened. This wasn't brain surgery on the part of NC State. There was
no finesse to it. They killed a gnat with a sledgehammer, flooding the backfield
with blitzes and barely paying for it the whole game.
There are two questions to be answered here: how
did the sacks happen, and what did VT do to combat State's blitzes?
On the surface, the reason VT gave up 10 sacks is
simple: NC State blitzed play after play after play. They played man coverage
with their junior and senior cornerbacks against VT's freshman receivers, and
they blitzed with their safeties and linebackers.
But on any particularly play, blitzes work for
different reasons. Perhaps the QB holds the ball too long, the receivers don't
get open, or the offensive line and running backs blow a block.
Let's break down NC State's ten sacks by looking
at VT's formation, the number of rushers, whether or not Tech had a tailback in
to block, and how much time elapsed from the time the ball was snapped to the
time Randall was sacked.
NC State Sacks
Justin Hamilton is the tailback. He
releases to the right and is covered. Randall scrambles to the right, and
on his blind side, Jeff King is beaten and his man sacks Randall from
Both tailbacks go out into patterns.
Randall holds the ball too long and is sacked.
One of the tailbacks is in the slot, the
other stays back to block. Reggie Butler is beaten quickly for the sack,
and Randall has nowhere to go.
The tailback stays in to block. Randall
pulls the ball down after 2.5 seconds, dances around in the pocket, and
gets sacked. Receivers are not open on the play.
Imoh flares out to the right, Randall
doesn't throw to him, blitzer comes up the middle untouched for the sack.
Shotgun formation with the tailback in the
slot, tight end split out wide, so it really looks like a 4-wide
formation. Imoh is in the slot with his man 10 yards off the line of
scrimmage, but VT doesn't hot read a throw to him (Note 1 below)
Shotgun, Randall rolls right, gets sacked
quickly by multiple defenders. At the end of the play, 5 OL are standing
around blocking nobody.
Jimmy Martin blows his block and Randall
gets sacked from the blind side.
Shotgun, blocking is pretty good, Randall
doesn't throw to an open receiver (King seemed to be open down the middle
of the field). Randall breaks the pocket, gets sacked. (Note 2 below)
Shotgun, zone blitz, Randall never budges
and is sacked. NC State overloads the left side of the line and springs a
guy in untouched.
Key: Qtr = quarter; Time=time on game clock;
Formation=VT's offensive formation on the play; Rushers = number of
Rushers NC State brought on the play; Time = time from the snap of the
ball until Randall was sacked.
Note 1: On this play, the other
three receivers on the line (2 WRs and a TE) were covered man to man right
at the line of scrimmage, but Imoh, who was in the slot, had ten yards of
space between him and his defender. It would have been very easy for
Randall to immediately fire the ball to Imoh right after the snap, giving
him room to work. But instead, Imoh charged downfield into coverage and
Randall was sacked in less than three seconds. This is a perfect example
of giving up an easy pass to run a play that didn't work.
Note 2: Randall had plenty of time
to throw to King down the middle. The TV replay was from behind the
pocket, and it showed King breaking open about 15 yards downfield. Perhaps
there was an extra safety not in the picture that Randall saw, making him
not throw to King. But from what was visible on screen, Randall passed up
the TE down the middle.
The sacks, as you can see, all happened for a
variety of reasons, in a variety of formations, with a varying number of
sacks happened with no blitz at all, just four rushers. Three more of the sacks
happened with just five rushers, meaning that only half of the sacks came
because of a heavy blitz (more than five rushers).
The five blitzes that occurred with just four or
five rushers came about because Randall was holding the ball too long, Randall
didn't use available receivers (back in the flat, tight end down the middle), or
the offensive line blew a block or got overloaded on one side.
The other five sacks occurred with six or seven
rushers. In those plays, the O-line either got overloaded or missed a block, or
Randall held the ball too long, or no one was open.
Each individual sack happened for varying
reasons. You can blame some plays on the OL, some on Randall for holding the
ball or not throwing to a receiver, and some on the receivers themselves for not
On Monday's Hokie Hotline, Stinespring had the
following to say when asked how the ten sacks happened:
"The sacks came this way: The offensive
line for the day actually did a nice job in pass protection. They gave up
one sack, and we gave up one hurry for the day. Another sack was incurred by
the tight end, the backs were responsible for three, we had a receiver run a
bad route and cause us not to get the ball off in time. That cost us one.
Our quarterback was responsible for four or five himself.
"[How can the QB can be responsible?]
There's an opportunity to get a protection set and be able to pick up the
blitzes. If you're not able to pick the blitzes up because of the
protection, then you've got to get rid of the ball quicker. There were two
times he had a chance to set up protection, and get the blitz picked up, and
we didn't get that done. They blitzed, and we didn't have any hots or sights
because of that, and we got hit. A couple times, we didn't throw it on
There isn't any one answer why the sacks
happened. Each one of you out there reading this has their own personal bugaboo:
either you think Randall holds the ball too long, or you think the offensive
line stinks, or you think the backs can't block, or you think the receivers
can't get open. The truth is, the sacks themselves occurred for any one or more
of those reasons at any given time.
Five times, Randall held the ball for more than 3
seconds. But five other times, he barely had time to set up shop (2.7 seconds or
less), so either he didn't have a play that would succeed, the right protection
wasn't set, his blockers didn't block well enough, he didn't have the guts to
throw it to a covered receiver, or his receivers weren't open.
Let's get back to reason #1: "He didn't have
a play that would succeed." Let's talk a little bit about what VT did to
combat the heavy pressure being brought by State.
What the Hokies Did to Battle the Blitz
A lot of the complaining after the game centered
on the fact that VT did "nothing" to combat the blitz. No screens, no
passes to the backs out of the backfield, no throws to the tight end, no QB
Au contraire, VT did all of these things. But in
studying what they did, I discovered something interesting.
What you look for in these instances is something
other than "run up the middle" or "take a seven-step drop and
stand in the pocket." So I went through the game film and counted and
analyzed every play that did something other than that. I looked for options,
rollouts, screens, reverses, throws to the tight ends, etc.
I may have missed a play here or there (because I
was looking for a lot of stuff) but I counted 26 plays (out of 69 offensive
plays) that I thought fit the category of trying to take advantage of a blitz or
getting the offensive players away from pressure and into one-on-one situations.
The plays were spread evenly throughout the game, with 9 of the 26, almost a
third, coming in the fourth quarter.
Here's what I found:
Option (5): The Hokies ran
the option five times for 18 yards. Every option play gained anywhere from 1 to
6 yards, and no option plays lost yardage. Randall pitched most of the time,
which is rare for him, and Tech tried it with both Imoh and Humes.
QB Draw (2): Randall was
stuffed for a 4-yard loss in an early QB draw (terrible blocking by the O-line),
and in a 4th-quarter QB draw, he picked up 7 yards.
QB Rollouts (9): Randall
rolled out 9 times throughout the course of the game. One was a designed run
that went for 8 yards on Tech's first possession. The rest were passes. He was
sacked on one of them (when Jeff King missed his block), and on the other five,
he completed just one pass, the beautiful sideline catch by Duane Brown early in
the game. Randall threw poorly on the rollouts in this game, missing open
receivers and once, on the last drive of the game, throwing it straight to a
defender who dropped it.
One rollout was perhaps VT's best play call and
best execution of the day. It came on the touchdown to Kinzer. The Hokies used
play-action (a fake handoff) up the middle on 3rd and 3 from State's 4-yard
line, and Randall rolled out right. State bit on the play fake, Kinzer was wide
open on the play, and Randall hit him for an easy TD.
Later, the Hokies tried something very similar,
and State didn't bite on it. The Hokies faked a toss sweep left on 3rd and goal
in the second quarter, and Randall rolled out right. NC State defended it well,
greeting him with a couple of rushers, and he threw the ball through the back of
the end zone. Tech kicked the field goal on the next play. Good play call, it
just didn't work.
Throw to the tailback in the flat (2):
On this play, the QB dumps the ball off to a tailback out in the flat either as
a safety valve or by design. In this game, VT called designed flat passes to try
to isolate the back against a linebacker on the perimeter. The Hokies ran one of
these to Humes early in the game, but Jimmy Martin didn't get there in time to
block the linebacker, and he nailed Humes for a 4-yard loss. Late in the game,
the Hokies tried it again to Imoh, but it was knocked down at the line. The same
situation was occurring with Martin not getting out quickly enough to protect
Imoh, and Imoh would have immediately been confronted with a linebacker, just
like Humes was.
End-around (1): In the
second quarter, VT ran an end-around to Richard Johnson, and he was stopped for
Toss sweep (1): The Hokies
ran this once for a gain of 2 yards. They faked it two other times, as detailed
in the "QB Rollouts" section.
handoffs up the middle (3): In the third quarter,
the Hokies ran a counter/draw play to Humes for a 1-yard gain. Later in the
third, they handed off to Imoh out of the shotgun, and he was buried for a loss
The third time was the charm. In the fourth
quarter, the Hokies ran a misdirection play where the offense started out left,
and Randall handed off to Imoh in the other direction. It was beautifully
designed and blocked, and Imoh turned it into a 41-yard gain.
Tight end down the middle (1):
A guaranteed blitz-buster. Late in the third quarter, from deep in VT territory,
Randall hit King down the middle for 24 yards. The problem? It came on 3rd and
As detailed in the "Sacks" section, I
noted King running a pattern down the middle of the field another time, but for
whatever reason, Randall didn't throw it to him.
Screen Pass (1): With 13
minutes to go in the fourth quarter in State territory, the Hokies ran their
only true screen pass of the game, a play in which the OL releases and gets out
in front of a running back, who is thrown a short pass. Tech ran a middle
screen, dumping it off to Hamilton with an escort. Hamilton picked up 11 yards.
The problem? It was 3rd and 15.
Shovel Pass (1): With 5:33
to go in the fourth quarter, on 2nd and 10, the Hokies called a shovel pass to
Kinzer. It was set up beautifully, but Reggie Butler failed to get out in front
of Kinzer and make a block on the only guy with a chance to tackle him. Butler
missed the block, and Kinzer was tackled for a loss of one with all kinds of
real estate in front of him.
Summing it Up
That's a lot to absorb, so here it is, boiled
down. The best way to whip a blitzing team is to get the ball to the spots their
linebackers and safeties have vacated. In State's case, their inside linebackers
and safeties were clearing out of the middle of the field and coming up the
The large majority of blitz-buster plays that
Tech ran were to the perimeter. Option, QB rollouts, flare passes to the running
backs … these didn't work. The few that did work used an element of
misdirection first: a fake toss sweep, or a fake handoff up the middle. The TD
to Kinzer came on such a play.
Contrary to what many people think, you don't
usually beat an aggressive defense by going around it. You go right at it. That
might get you knocked down two out of three times, but the third time, all hell
breaks loose. One of my first realizations of this came back in 1993 when
Rutgers' Terrell Willis busted right up the gut of a blitzing Tech defense for a
38-yard touchdown run on which he was barely touched.
Remember Reggie Bush's screen pass for a TD in
the BCA Classic? USC went right at the blitzing Xavier Adibi and Vince Hall,
dumping the ball off right behind them, and Bush did the rest.
Throughout the 90s, TV announcers and
commentators said it over and over and over again. They would watch some poor
hapless team run a sweep against Tech's defense, and they would say, "This
defense is too fast. You don't beat it by trying to outrun it to the perimeter.
You beat it by going straight at it and hoping you bust a big play."
The QB draws up the middle didn't work well for
Tech, and two of the three delayed handoffs up the middle didn't work .. but
boy, the last one did (41 yards by Imoh).
The tight end down the middle worked like a charm
the one time Randall actually threw it. The middle screen worked well, too. (My
only complaint there was personnel; Hamilton got 11 yards on the play, and I
think Imoh would have gotten a bunch more.) The shovel pass would have gone for
a ton of yards, too, if Reggie Butler had gotten out of traffic and made his
What was missing in this game plan were plays
designed to attack the middle of the field. When the Hokies finally did that,
starting late third quarter, they peeled off gains of 24 (King down the middle)
41 (misdirection inside handoff to Imoh), and 11 (middle screen to Hamilton)
yards, and they almost killed State with a shovel pass.
But the three-step drops, the quick slants to the
wide receivers? Absent. The pass down the middle to the tight end? Tried just
once. A true screen pass, not just a flare pass to a running back? Tried just
once. These are the bread and butter against the blitz.
"What Happened There?"
That's where the offensive coaching staff failed
this team. They failed to burn State's blitz-happy defense. They failed to make
the State coaching staff and players stop and think for just a split-second as
they pinned their ears back and rushed hard.
The most disturbing thing of all were the quotes
after the game:
"We have to watch the film, really, to see
where all the pressure came from." – Jimmy Martin.
"I don't know exactly where all of them
were coming from. Most of the time, we'd come back [to the huddle] and each
man, like my left guard and right guard, we're like 'what happened there?'
" – Will Montgomery.
"The blitzes and stuff just kind of messed
with us. We had trouble picking it up." – Jimmy Martin again.
"I'm not sure if they just outmanned us or
it we just didn't get them blocked very well." – Frank Beamer.
"I never thought they would handle us that
way. Never, never, never thought that would happen." – Beamer again.
Knowing what happened and not being able to stop
it is one thing. Many times over the years, VT has beaten up hapless teams like
UAB, JMU, Akron, and Western Michigan.
But not being able to describe at the end of a
game what just happened is worrisome. There's a coaching staff in Blacksburg
that collectively gets paid over two million dollars a year, and if they can't
recognize what's going on, communicate it to the players, and make adjustments,
that doesn't bode well.
I much would have preferred hearing Martin or
Montgomery say, "They brought six or seven guys on most plays, manning up
on the receivers and bringing the safety and linebackers a lot. We just got
outnumbered and had trouble making the plays to combat it. The stuff to the
perimeter wasn't working as well as we thought it would, because they're so
fast." Not "What happened there?"
The kids often can't tell in the hysteria of the
game what's going on, but when they come to the sidelines, the coaching staff
ought to pull them aside, explain things to them, and tell them what they're
going to do to counter it.
I would have preferred hearing Beamer say,
"They surprised me the way they came at us, because we hadn't seen that on
film, but once we realized what they were doing – challenging our young
receivers with their bigger, more mature defensive backs, and blitzing everybody
else – we started working the middle of the field a little bit better, trying
to take advantage of them." Not "I never thought they would handle us
I'm just disappointed in a coaching staff that
got caught with its pants down and didn't adjust offensively to stay competitive
in the game. After the Duke game, the Hokies should have suspected that State
would pin their ears back and try to maul a Hokie offense that so far this
season has mostly left the fullback on the bench and has gone with spread
formations and tried to let the QB do all the work. But they were unprepared for
what they saw and had no answer for it. They were outcoached, because the let
the other coaching staff and team do as they pleased all day long, without
reprisal. The game was dictated to them. For VT, the adjustments that worked
came too late.
In a close game like this, I like to review the
plays that turned the tide and determined the outcome. It's usually about 5-8
plays, and in this game, there were 11 of them.
I'm not counting Brandon Pace's two missed field
goals, because the nickname "Captain Obvious" isn't one that I want.
Here are the other 11 plays I noted:
1.) NCSU 3rd and 15 on their first drive: Mikal
Baaqee blitzes up the middle and misses the sack. Jay Davis dumps off to
McLendon in the flat. Eric Green misses the tackle on McLendon, who rumbles for
the first down. NCSU scores a field goal on that possession. 3-0, State.
2.) NCSU's 2nd drive: Vince Fuller picks off
Davis and laterals to Green, who runs it to the State 39 yard line. VT misses a
field goal. 3-0, State.
3.) Late first quarter: State backup QB Marcus
Stone and McLendon have a poor handoff exchange, fumble recovered by Tech's Jim
Davis on State's 36 yard line. Hokies get a TD out of it. 7-3, VT.
4.) Early second quarter: Eddie Royal returns a
punt 58 yards to the State 15-yard line. Hokies get a field goal out of it.
5.) Late second quarter: two straight NC State
sacks push the Hokies back to their own 2-yard line, and after the punt, State
has the ball at VT 34. State gets a touchdown out of it. 10-10.
13:15 to go, third quarter: McLendon fumbles on the State 35, and it rolls out
of bounds. Oh, if the Hokies had recovered that one …
7.) 11:34 to go, third quarter: Royal returns
punt from the VT 8 to VT 48, changing the field position game.
8.) 5:50 to go, third quarter: Burns fumbles the
snap on the VT 5 yard line. State gets a TD out of it. 17-10, State.
9.) 15:00 to go, fourth quarter: Imoh makes
41-yard run, VT gets a field goal. 17-13, State.
10.) 10:04 to go, fourth quarter: Eddie Royal
makes diving catch for 32 yards to the State 29. VT gets a field goal out of it.
State 17, VT 16.
11.) 0:35 to go, fourth quarter: Clowney with a
38 yard reception. Puts VT in position for the game winner. Unfortunately …
(you know the rest).
- I was impressed with the play of Jonathan
Lewis Saturday. He pursued very well down the line and really got after it.
Lewis "only" had four tackles, but it looked like more. He was
very active and made the initial hit a number of times.
- This isn't the first time Vinnie Burns dropped a snap
deep in his own territory. In the 2001 Syracuse game, a 22-14 loss in Lane
Stadium, Burns dropped a snap inside the 10-yard line with less than 10
seconds left to go in the first half. Burns was able to pick that one up,
but Syracuse blocked it, recovered it on the VT 8-yard line with 7 seconds
to go, and kicked a critical field goal.
- Once again, Duane Brown flashed the athletic potential
that has the Hokie coaches drooling. His toes-on-the-sideline catch in the
first quarter was not something you'll see from many tight ends anywhere, at
- VT won the penalty battle, but unfortunately, it didn't
help. Tech had 3 penalties for 14 yards, and State had 10 for 65. Two times
NC State and Tech had offsetting penalties. One of them occurred when VT
committed pass interference that would have given State a first down inside
the Tech 30. Instead, State had an offsetting holding penalty, their drive
stalled, and they punted.
oh man, can Eddie Royal play. He just makes one big play after another.
Three punt returns for 107 yards, and two catches for 47 yards, including
that diving 32-yarder. Olu Hall was the #1-ranked player in the state last
year, and Royal was #2. Hall's at Hargrave now, and Royal's making plays in
orange and maroon. This isn't a slam on Hall, because he's a great kid (I've
interviewed him) who may have a great college career. I'm just saying, I'd
much rather have Royal right now.
- Where this game started to break down: The Hokies were
up 7-3 and had 1st and goal from the State 5-yard line with 11 minutes to go
in the second quarter. They had the Wolfpack on their heels and failed to
capitalize, getting only a field goal out of it. The Wolfpack got their
first two sacks on VT's next possession, and after that, it was off to the
races for the State defense.
- The return of the whip blitz: Aaron Rouse and James
Anderson both had tackles for loss from their whip linebacker position on
plays where they blitzed. For those of us who remember the first whip
linebackers on this team (Dwayne Knight and Brandon Semones), and how much
they used to blitz, that's a welcome sight.
- The Hokies also used the corner blitz. Eric Green
blasted Marcus Stone on State's next to last possession, right after Stone
released the ball.
There was a lot more to talk about in this game
– the Hokie defense played very, very well and deserved some space in this
article, and Randall and the receivers made some clutch plays late in the game
-- but I wanted to concentrate on what State did defensively and what VT did in
The issue of game-time adjustments keeps coming
up with this coaching staff. We didn't see the Hokies adjust to Heath Miller
catching 13 passes in last year's UVa game. We saw USC make adjustments in the
first game and come back for the win. We didn't see VT make adjustments in this
game until it was too late.
Believe me, I want nothing more than to recap a
situation in which VT did some things in the second half that led them to a
come-from-behind win. But this team is 4-7 over its last 11 games, the duration
of a college football season, with those wins coming against Miami (niiiiice!),
Temple, Western Michigan, and Duke.
There will be more close games this year: WVU,
Maryland, Virginia, and maybe Georgia Tech and Wake Forest. Miami may or may not
be close. In those games, adjustments by the coaching staff can mean the
difference between a bowl game and sitting at home. This NC State game was the
first critical contest in Tech's bid to be competitive in the ACC this year, and
they dropped it. It's an uphill climb from here. Fortunately, there are still 8
games to go, including 6 in the ACC.